Review



human ef1α short efs promoter  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc human ef1α short efs promoter
    Experimental workflow of the study, promoter characteristics and vector designs. ( A , B ) Schematic representation of the workflow: Promoter strengths in the transient expression context were quantified using dual luciferase assay and flow cytometry analysis. ( A ) All nine promoters were compared based on luciferase activity in CHO cell variants and HEK-293T cells (Experimental setting 1). To corroborate the dual luciferase reporter findings, one weak and three relatively strong promoters were cloned into the dual fluorescence reporter system and further investigated by flow cytometry analysis (Experimental setting 2). ( B ) The activity of five relatively strong promoters selected and prioritized from ( A ) was evaluated in stable transfectants of CHO-DG44 suspension cells by dual luciferase assay. Further experiments were performed to analyze the expression of Fluc and Rluc genes, as well as the copy number of Rluc and DHFR genes. ( C ) The list of well-known constitutive promoters tested herein. Color codes represent the origin of promoters. ( D ) The table depicts promoter lengths. ( E ) Representative vector maps of all-in-one reporter systems. In the dual luciferase reporter system, the variable promoter (CMV-mIE) was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK, <t>EF1α,</t> <t>EFS,</t> UBC, PGK, CHEF1α and CAG promoters. In the dual fluorescent reporter system, the variable CMV-mIE was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK and CHEF1α promoters. For stable expression analysis, the constructs with CMV-mIE, SV40, UBC, CHEF1α and CAG promoters were engineered to coexpress Rluc and DHFR genes separated by an IRES sequence, creating a bicistronic expression cassette. The schematics in ( E ) are created with BioRender.com.
    Human Ef1α Short Efs Promoter, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 5570 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human ef1α short efs promoter/product/Addgene inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 5570 article reviews
    human ef1α short efs promoter - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Engineering and validation of a dual luciferase reporter system for quantitative and systematic assessment of regulatory sequences in Chinese hamster ovary cells"

    Article Title: Engineering and validation of a dual luciferase reporter system for quantitative and systematic assessment of regulatory sequences in Chinese hamster ovary cells

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09887-2

    Experimental workflow of the study, promoter characteristics and vector designs. ( A , B ) Schematic representation of the workflow: Promoter strengths in the transient expression context were quantified using dual luciferase assay and flow cytometry analysis. ( A ) All nine promoters were compared based on luciferase activity in CHO cell variants and HEK-293T cells (Experimental setting 1). To corroborate the dual luciferase reporter findings, one weak and three relatively strong promoters were cloned into the dual fluorescence reporter system and further investigated by flow cytometry analysis (Experimental setting 2). ( B ) The activity of five relatively strong promoters selected and prioritized from ( A ) was evaluated in stable transfectants of CHO-DG44 suspension cells by dual luciferase assay. Further experiments were performed to analyze the expression of Fluc and Rluc genes, as well as the copy number of Rluc and DHFR genes. ( C ) The list of well-known constitutive promoters tested herein. Color codes represent the origin of promoters. ( D ) The table depicts promoter lengths. ( E ) Representative vector maps of all-in-one reporter systems. In the dual luciferase reporter system, the variable promoter (CMV-mIE) was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK, EF1α, EFS, UBC, PGK, CHEF1α and CAG promoters. In the dual fluorescent reporter system, the variable CMV-mIE was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK and CHEF1α promoters. For stable expression analysis, the constructs with CMV-mIE, SV40, UBC, CHEF1α and CAG promoters were engineered to coexpress Rluc and DHFR genes separated by an IRES sequence, creating a bicistronic expression cassette. The schematics in ( E ) are created with BioRender.com.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Experimental workflow of the study, promoter characteristics and vector designs. ( A , B ) Schematic representation of the workflow: Promoter strengths in the transient expression context were quantified using dual luciferase assay and flow cytometry analysis. ( A ) All nine promoters were compared based on luciferase activity in CHO cell variants and HEK-293T cells (Experimental setting 1). To corroborate the dual luciferase reporter findings, one weak and three relatively strong promoters were cloned into the dual fluorescence reporter system and further investigated by flow cytometry analysis (Experimental setting 2). ( B ) The activity of five relatively strong promoters selected and prioritized from ( A ) was evaluated in stable transfectants of CHO-DG44 suspension cells by dual luciferase assay. Further experiments were performed to analyze the expression of Fluc and Rluc genes, as well as the copy number of Rluc and DHFR genes. ( C ) The list of well-known constitutive promoters tested herein. Color codes represent the origin of promoters. ( D ) The table depicts promoter lengths. ( E ) Representative vector maps of all-in-one reporter systems. In the dual luciferase reporter system, the variable promoter (CMV-mIE) was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK, EF1α, EFS, UBC, PGK, CHEF1α and CAG promoters. In the dual fluorescent reporter system, the variable CMV-mIE was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK and CHEF1α promoters. For stable expression analysis, the constructs with CMV-mIE, SV40, UBC, CHEF1α and CAG promoters were engineered to coexpress Rluc and DHFR genes separated by an IRES sequence, creating a bicistronic expression cassette. The schematics in ( E ) are created with BioRender.com.

    Techniques Used: Plasmid Preparation, Expressing, Luciferase, Flow Cytometry, Activity Assay, Clone Assay, Fluorescence, Suspension, Construct, Sequencing



    Similar Products

    human ef1α short efs promoter  (Addgene inc)
    96
    Addgene inc human ef1α short efs promoter
    Experimental workflow of the study, promoter characteristics and vector designs. ( A , B ) Schematic representation of the workflow: Promoter strengths in the transient expression context were quantified using dual luciferase assay and flow cytometry analysis. ( A ) All nine promoters were compared based on luciferase activity in CHO cell variants and HEK-293T cells (Experimental setting 1). To corroborate the dual luciferase reporter findings, one weak and three relatively strong promoters were cloned into the dual fluorescence reporter system and further investigated by flow cytometry analysis (Experimental setting 2). ( B ) The activity of five relatively strong promoters selected and prioritized from ( A ) was evaluated in stable transfectants of CHO-DG44 suspension cells by dual luciferase assay. Further experiments were performed to analyze the expression of Fluc and Rluc genes, as well as the copy number of Rluc and DHFR genes. ( C ) The list of well-known constitutive promoters tested herein. Color codes represent the origin of promoters. ( D ) The table depicts promoter lengths. ( E ) Representative vector maps of all-in-one reporter systems. In the dual luciferase reporter system, the variable promoter (CMV-mIE) was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK, <t>EF1α,</t> <t>EFS,</t> UBC, PGK, CHEF1α and CAG promoters. In the dual fluorescent reporter system, the variable CMV-mIE was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK and CHEF1α promoters. For stable expression analysis, the constructs with CMV-mIE, SV40, UBC, CHEF1α and CAG promoters were engineered to coexpress Rluc and DHFR genes separated by an IRES sequence, creating a bicistronic expression cassette. The schematics in ( E ) are created with BioRender.com.
    Human Ef1α Short Efs Promoter, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human ef1α short efs promoter/product/Addgene inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human ef1α short efs promoter - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Experimental workflow of the study, promoter characteristics and vector designs. ( A , B ) Schematic representation of the workflow: Promoter strengths in the transient expression context were quantified using dual luciferase assay and flow cytometry analysis. ( A ) All nine promoters were compared based on luciferase activity in CHO cell variants and HEK-293T cells (Experimental setting 1). To corroborate the dual luciferase reporter findings, one weak and three relatively strong promoters were cloned into the dual fluorescence reporter system and further investigated by flow cytometry analysis (Experimental setting 2). ( B ) The activity of five relatively strong promoters selected and prioritized from ( A ) was evaluated in stable transfectants of CHO-DG44 suspension cells by dual luciferase assay. Further experiments were performed to analyze the expression of Fluc and Rluc genes, as well as the copy number of Rluc and DHFR genes. ( C ) The list of well-known constitutive promoters tested herein. Color codes represent the origin of promoters. ( D ) The table depicts promoter lengths. ( E ) Representative vector maps of all-in-one reporter systems. In the dual luciferase reporter system, the variable promoter (CMV-mIE) was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK, EF1α, EFS, UBC, PGK, CHEF1α and CAG promoters. In the dual fluorescent reporter system, the variable CMV-mIE was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK and CHEF1α promoters. For stable expression analysis, the constructs with CMV-mIE, SV40, UBC, CHEF1α and CAG promoters were engineered to coexpress Rluc and DHFR genes separated by an IRES sequence, creating a bicistronic expression cassette. The schematics in ( E ) are created with BioRender.com.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Engineering and validation of a dual luciferase reporter system for quantitative and systematic assessment of regulatory sequences in Chinese hamster ovary cells

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09887-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Experimental workflow of the study, promoter characteristics and vector designs. ( A , B ) Schematic representation of the workflow: Promoter strengths in the transient expression context were quantified using dual luciferase assay and flow cytometry analysis. ( A ) All nine promoters were compared based on luciferase activity in CHO cell variants and HEK-293T cells (Experimental setting 1). To corroborate the dual luciferase reporter findings, one weak and three relatively strong promoters were cloned into the dual fluorescence reporter system and further investigated by flow cytometry analysis (Experimental setting 2). ( B ) The activity of five relatively strong promoters selected and prioritized from ( A ) was evaluated in stable transfectants of CHO-DG44 suspension cells by dual luciferase assay. Further experiments were performed to analyze the expression of Fluc and Rluc genes, as well as the copy number of Rluc and DHFR genes. ( C ) The list of well-known constitutive promoters tested herein. Color codes represent the origin of promoters. ( D ) The table depicts promoter lengths. ( E ) Representative vector maps of all-in-one reporter systems. In the dual luciferase reporter system, the variable promoter (CMV-mIE) was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK, EF1α, EFS, UBC, PGK, CHEF1α and CAG promoters. In the dual fluorescent reporter system, the variable CMV-mIE was replaced by SV40, HSV-TK and CHEF1α promoters. For stable expression analysis, the constructs with CMV-mIE, SV40, UBC, CHEF1α and CAG promoters were engineered to coexpress Rluc and DHFR genes separated by an IRES sequence, creating a bicistronic expression cassette. The schematics in ( E ) are created with BioRender.com.

    Article Snippet: Accordingly, the variable CMV-mIE promoter was successfully replaced by the following promoters: simian virus 40 (SV40) enhancer/early promoter (template: pcDNA3.1( +)/myc-His A, Invitrogen), herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) promoter (template: pRL-TK, Promega), mouse phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK) promoter (template: TTI-GFP, Scott Lowe laboratory), human eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha (EF1α) promoter (template: pENTR5’/EF1αp, Invitrogen), human EF1α short (EFS) promoter (template: lentiCRISPR v2, Addgene plasmid #52961), Chinese hamster EF1α (CHEF1α) promoter (template: CHO-WT gDNA, GenBank accession number AY188393.1, position 11151–12623 or − 463 to + 1010 according to transcription start site), cytomegalovirus (CMV) early enhancer element fused to the chicken beta-actin (CAG) promoter (template: pCAG-ERT2CreERT2, Addgene plasmid #13777), and human ubiquitin C (UBC) promoter (template: pLV hUbC-VP64 dCas9 VP64-T2A-GFP, Addgene plasmid #59791).

    Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Expressing, Luciferase, Flow Cytometry, Activity Assay, Clone Assay, Fluorescence, Suspension, Construct, Sequencing